Quantum Dots Corona Blood Libel & Milgram Experiment

flus compared

We discuss the Coronavirus in several ways here in order that we would come to a clearer understanding. Might there be another story or two running in the background?

Let us see more:

Think: Look for the coronavirus death obituaries. Primary causes? Permission to explore story of death? No.

Think: RESET

Think: The real virus is FEAR

Think: 5G is a Tholian Web

Test Kits :

  1. Test for Coronavirus?

2. Who is making the revenue from these test kits? Trace it out.

3. Collect your DNA?

Quantum Dots Deliver Vaccines, Encode Vaccination History in the Skin

What is Bill Gates promoting? Take a closer look:

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Jan. 7, 2020 — Using fluorescent quantum dots, an MIT research team has created a way to administer vaccinations and record a patient’s vaccination history in the skin. The researchers developed a microneedle platform that can selectively deliver microparticles into the skin in various patterns, which remain invisible to the naked eye but can be detected in the infrared (IR) using a smartphone that has the IR filter removed. The microparticles contain quantum dots, which store the person’s vaccination history in a pattern of dye that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine.

Encapsulation allows the dye to remain in place, under the skin, after being injected.

https://www.photonics.com/Articles/Quantum_Dots_Deliver_Vaccines_Encode_Vaccination/a65443

Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches record vaccination

Here, we present an approach to encode medical history on a patient using the spatial distribution of biocompatible, near-infrared quantum dots (NIR QDs) in the dermis.

These findings suggest that intradermal QDs can be used to reliably encode information and can be delivered with a vaccine, which may be particularly valuable in the developing world and open up new avenues for decentralized data storage and biosensing.

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/523/eaay7162

hqdefault

resear7

Quantum-Dots-Market-and-Patent-Infographics-1-800x1200

You are being sold an inversion (an upside down society) which uses partial truths for people to bite. Let’s go further below shall we? What you are experiencing around the world is Agenda 21/2030 being rolled out.

Is this phenomenon we are in together right now ‘real‘ or just ‘fearmongering‘ ?

‘Both’ and more.

Is the Coronavirus real? Yes.

Are people dying? Yes.

Is this a social Experiment? – Yes.

Yet there will be a Goshen as was for the Hebrews in Egypt (More below)

South Korea to use electronic wristbands to enforce COVID-19 quarantine

Why do these wristbands remind me of something else? (video)

For more info:

Holocaust Badges

Universal Basic Income

This is a global ration system. Like what was given to Native Americans (First Nations) locked down on their postage stamp reserves.

The Coronavirus – Blood libel

The Line in the sand has now been crossed. We are now into the ‘Blood Libel’ zone.

The New York Times, a news outlet all too familiar with libel, has recently accused Evangelicals of a reverse psychology blood libel . This by insinuating Evangelical Christians are ‘non-scientific’ and therefore are bringing on more disease and harm because they may not play ball with modern group think narrative which by the way is always changing (said differently Evangelicals have dissenting opinions or views than the current popular norm of some others)

What is a blood libel? Here are a couple well known examples:

In the Middle Ages, and in the Modern Middle East Jewish People have been accused of mixing blood in their passover bread. The blood of Christian children.

bl

Another form of blood libel was that of accusing people of poisoning the wells. This was done towards Jews living in Europe.

Jewish people were also accused of ‘poisoning the wells‘ in Europe during the onset of the Black Death (1347-1353). People were dying and given this was a pre-germ theory and pre-microscope world did not know what was killing everyone.

deededed

кровавый навет

Russian Jewish Blood Libel (Russian)

КРОВА́ВЫЙ НАВЕ́Т, обвинение евреев в убийстве иноверцев (главным образом христиан) для употребления их крови в ритуальных целях.

Подобные обвинения, получившие широкое распространение в средние века в разных католических странах Европы, а позднее в странах православия, продолжали появляться и в 19–20 вв., главным образом под влиянием антисемитской и нацистской пропаганды. Тщетно издавались против них папские буллы и королевские указы, безуспешно выступали просвещенные круги европейской общественности, сурово осуждавшие появление кровавых наветов в цивилизованном мире. Даже после Второй мировой войны они время от времени возникали в южных и восточных республиках Советского Союза.

Открытое обвинение евреев и ранних христиан в принесении человеческих жертв с целью употребления их крови при культовых обрядах возникло в Римской империи и восходит к первым столетиям нашей эры. В сочинениях тех эллинистических писателей, которые враждебно относились к евреям и их религии, такие измышления направлены только против них, как, например, в писаниях Апиона (1 в. н. э.), жителя Александрии (ср. Иосиф Флавий, Апион 2:89–102). Однако в античном мире эти обвинения не получили существенного распространения в широких массах. Зато уверенность в ритуальном употреблении евреями человеческой крови прочно укоренилась в сознании христиан.

Почвой для этого служила христианская доктрина об искуплении смертью Иисуса грехов всего человечества. Поскольку распятию Иисуса предшествовала его общая с учениками пасхальная (см. Песах) трапеза (Тайная вечеря), она толковалась как жертвоприношение «агнца Божьего» по ассоциации с закалывавшимся в Храме жертвенным ягненком, которого Тора предписывала каждой еврейской семье съедать за вечерней трапезой в праздник Песах в память о чудесах, совершенных Богом при исходе израильтян из Египта.

Евангелие, возлагающее вину за казнь Иисуса на евреев, породило представление о них как о «народе-богоубийце», а вера христиан в чудодейственные свойства «крови Христовой», веками будоражившая воображение народных масс, побудила их приписать и евреям подобную веру в магическое действие крови не только Иисуса, но также христианских святых и мучеников. Таким образом, ассоциация распятия с библейским ритуалом и суеверие слились в народном представлении в убеждение, что евреям к празднику Песах необходима христианская кровь для ритуальных нужд.

И не случайно почти все кровавые наветы приурочивались к этому празднику или ко времени, близкому к нему. Так, один из самых ранних среди исторически фиксированных кровавых наветов (423 г. н. э.) произошел на Пурим в городе Инместар близ Антиохии. Обвинение местных евреев в распятии христианского мальчика вызвало резню членов еврейской общины и разрушение антиохийской синагоги.

Появление кровавых наветов в средние века связано с возникшей в 9 в. теологической полемикой о сущности евхаристии (причащения) и транссубстанции (пресуществления в ходе церковной службы хлеба и вина в тело и кровь Иисуса; см. Гостии осквернение), в 1215 г. ставших официальной догмой католической церкви. Широко распространившиеся в 12 в. представления об исцеляющей и искупляющей силе крови святых и мучеников порою приводили к соперничеству глав монастырей и епархий в обнаружении мощей местных «святых», в особенности детей, умерших мученической смертью «от рук злодеев». Их число стало столь велико, что IV Латеранский собор (1215) признал только за римским папой право причисления к лику святых.

Усиление финансовой деятельности евреев-ростовщиков (см. Ссуда денежная) в 11–13 вв. привело к углублению ненависти к ним христианского населения, а под влиянием проповедников-монахов в народном сознании сложился образ еврея как носителя зла, занимающегося черной магией, изувера, убивающего детей, чтобы использовать их кровь, посланца Сатаны. Инспираторы первого засвидетельствованного в Европе кровавого навета в Норвиче (Англия, 1144) утверждали, что евреи Европы составили заговор против христианского мира, обязывающий одну из еврейских общин, ежегодно по очереди определяемую жребием, приносить в жертву христианского ребенка.

В 1144 г. евреи Норвича, дескать, купили перед праздником Песах христианского младенца, подвергли его всем пыткам, каким подвергался Иисус, а в Страстную пятницу распяли «из ненависти к нашему Господу». Мотив мучения и распятия евреями христианских детей в насмешку над страстями Иисуса повторяется в кровавых наветах на протяжении 12–13 вв. и даже отражен в кодексе испанских законов (1263). В этом обвинялись евреи Глостера (1168), Бери-Сент-Эдменса (1181) и Уинчестера (1192) в Англии, Блуа (Франция, 1171) и Сарагосы (Испания, 1182, 1250).

По делу об убийстве мальчика Хьюго из Линкольна (Англия, 1255) были преданы суду 91 еврей и 18 из них казнены. В Германии евреев обвиняли в ненависти к духовной чистоте и безгрешности христианского ребенка. В «Беседах о чудесах» (1219–23) цистерцианский монах Цезарий Гейстербахский рассказывает о ребенке, у которого евреи вырвали язык, а тело разрезали на куски за то, что он, не слушаясь их, пел хвалебную песнь деве Марии. Обвинение евреев в использовании христианской крови в лечебных целях было выдвинуто впервые в 1235 г. в Фульде (Германия).

Духовные и светские власти неоднократно выступали против кровавых наветов, широко распространившихся с 13 в. В связи с наветом в Фульде император Фридрих II Гогенштауфен запросил мнения церковных авторитетов и ученых апостатов-евреев, заявив, что если обвинение будет доказано, то все евреи империи будут казнены, в противном же случае обвинение будет снято публично. Опубликованная в результате расследования грамота (1236) объявила евреев оправданными и запретила возбуждать против них подобные обвинения.

В грамоте говорилось: «Хотя мы по совести, на основании многих писаний, с которыми ознакомилось наше величество, считали достаточно доказанной невинность вышеупомянутых евреев, но все-таки для успокоения как необразованного народа, так и чувства справедливости, мы, с единогласного одобрения князей, знатных и благородных людей, аббатов и духовных лиц, отправили чрезвычайных посланников ко всем властителям Запада, которые затем прислали нам из различных государств много крещеных евреев, сведущих в еврейском законе. Этим последним, пробывшим немалое время у нас при дворе, мы приказали для отыскания правды прилежно исследовать и нам сообщить, существует ли у них (евреев) чье-либо мнение, которое побуждало бы евреев совершать вышеупомянутые преступления, нужные им для осуществления каких-либо иных целей. Их ответ гласил: «Ни в Ветхом, ни в Новом завете нет указаний, чтобы евреи жаждали человеческой крови. Напротив, в полном противоречии с этим утверждением, в Библии… в данных Моисеем законах, в еврейских постановлениях, которые по-еврейски называются Талмудом, совершенно ясно сказано, что они вообще должны беречься запятнания какой бы то ни было кровью». С очень большой долей вероятности мы можем предположить, что те, кому запрещена кровь даже разрешенных животных, едва ли могут жаждать человеческой крови».

Против кровавых наветов издавали приказы и буллы также папа Иннокентий IV (1247), чешский король Пржемысл II Отакар (1254), папа Григорий X (1272), император Рудольф I Габсбург (1277), герцог Альбрехт I Австрийский (1293), чешский король Вацлав II (1300), папа Мартин V (1422) и многие другие. Самое резкое порицание зачинщикам кровавых наветов было вынесено в специальной булле Николая V (1447), запрещавшей «навсегда и самым строгим образом всем верующим в Христа… предпринимать что-нибудь подобное против евреев вообще или против определенного еврея».

Христианский экзегет первой половины 14 в. Никола де Лир, а затем Мартин Лютер называли обвинение евреев в ритуальных убийствах глупостью и ложью. Тем не менее в средневековой Европе кровавые наветы не прекращались: они возникали во Франции (Вальреас, 1247; Труа, 1288; Шинон, 1317), в Германии (Пфорцхейм, 1267; Вейсенбург, 1270; Майнц, 1283; Мюнхен, 1285, 1345; Обервезель, 1286; Вейсензе, 1303; Иберлинген, 1332; Регенсбург, 1478), Австрии (Креме, 1293), Чехии (Прага, 1305); Швейцарии (Берн, 1294), Италии (Савойя, 1329). 146 еврейских общин южной и центральной Германии вследствие ряда кровавых наветов (Майнц, 1281, 1283; Мюнхен, 1285; Обервезель, 1286–87) в 1298 г. пострадали от резни, учиненной бесчинствующими толпами во главе с рыцарем Риндфлейшем.

Не всегда кровавый навет приводил к возбуждению судебного дела, однако исчезновение христианского ребенка, обнаружение трупа христианина близ еврейского жилища, а иногда и ни на чем не основанные слухи были достаточным поводом, чтобы без каких-либо улик заключить одного или многих евреев в тюрьму, подвергнуть их пыткам и таким образом добиться свидетельского показания, подтверждавшего обвинение в изуверстве отдельного еврея, всей общины, чаще всего — еврейского народа в целом.

Кровавые наветы сопровождались погромами и резней, нередко уничтожением или изгнанием целых еврейских общин. В подстрекательстве к эксцессам немалую роль играли проповеди монахов и христианских священников, разжигавших в простых людях суеверия и вселявших в них веру в обоснованность обвинений. Известны случаи, когда христиане предлагали продать своих детей для ритуальных целей евреям (например, Брно, 1343).

Уничтожение еврейских общин Германии, обвиненных в отравлении колодцев, якобы приведшем к эпидемии «Чёрной смерти» в середине 14 в., и резкое снижение числа евреев в Европе привело к переоценке городским патрициатом и бюргерами роли евреев в экономической жизни городов. Все более ценилась польза, которую евреи приносили нееврейскому населению. Этим, возможно, объясняется значительное сокращение числа кровавых наветов во второй половине 14 в. — первой половине 15 в. Однако уже во второй половине 15 в. травля со стороны монашеских орденов вместе с нарастающим брожением в церковных кругах вызвала новую волну гонений, одним из ярких симптомов которых стало усиление и учащение кровавых наветов.

Самым известным из них был кровавый навет в Тренто (северная Италия), где в 1475 г. был обнаружен труп христианского мальчика Симеона. Подстрекаемое фанатиками население оказало давление на судей, и все евреи города были подвергнуты пыткам. Некоторые из них были сломлены и признали себя виновными. Несмотря на осуждение Трентским епископом методов расследования и отрицательное отношение руководителей церкви, включая самого папу Сикста IV, к кровавым наветам, все евреи города были убиты, а Симеон объявлен святым.

За два года до изгнания евреев из Испании кровавый навет имел место в Ла-Гуардии. Шесть марранов и два еврея были обвинены в убийстве младенца (труп которого так и не обнаружили) и сожжены на костре. Культ «святого младенца» быстро распространился по всей стране и впоследствии послужил темой для художественных произведений поэтов и писателей, в том числе и для Лопе де Вега. Кровавые наветы возникали в Венеции (1480, 1506), в Будапеште (начало 16 в.), Дубровнике (1502, 1622).

В Восточной Европе первые кровавые наветы имели место в середине 14 в., но особое распространение получили с усилением влияния контрреформации в Польше со второй половины 16 в.: Бельск-Подляски (1564), Россош (1566), Вогин (1577), Гостынин (1577), Люблин (1598, 1636), Сандомир (1605, 1690), Седлец (1617), Сохачев (1619), Ленчица (1639), Ружаны (1658), Тыкоцин (1680).

В обвинениях на ритуальных процессах 17 в. вновь появляется мотив использования евреями христианской крови при выпечке маццы, опровергнутый еще буллой Мартина V в 1422 г. Одной из причин этой волны кровавых наветов была, очевидно, экономическая конкуренция евреев с христианами-горожанами. По мнению польского короля Сигизмунда II Августа, кровавые наветы вызывались стремлением «некоторых королевских подданных под вымышленными предлогами искоренить евреев в королевских городах».

В 1690 г. нашумел сандомирский кровавый навет, который, в отличие от большинства предыдущих кровавых наветов, поддерживался верховным католическим духовенством. С усилением вмешательства России, правительство которой поддерживало православную церковь, в дела Польши в Королевстве Польском обострилась борьба между православной и католической церковью. В руках последней кровавый навет превратился в орудие борьбы, при помощи которого она стремилась доказать свое религиозное усердие и рвение. В середине 18 в. кровавые наветы имели место в Познани (1736), Дунаевцах (1748), Житомире (1753), Ямполе (1756), Войсловицах (1761).

Католическое духовенство использовало отошедшую от еврейства секту франкистов (см. Я. Франк), которая на религиозном диспуте 1759 г. открыто обвинила «евреев-талмудистов» в употреблении христианской крови для ритуальных целей. В атмосфере опасности, нависшей над еврейским населением Польши, Ва‘ад четырех земель в конце 1757 г. послал представителя к папе Бенедикту XIV с ходатайством о защите еврейских общин Польши от ложных обвинений. Кардинал Лоренц Ганганелли (впоследствии папа Климент XIV), которому папа поручил рассмотрение вопроса, представил папе записку, благодаря которой евреи были вновь полностью оправданы. Король Август III подтвердил (после 1760 г.) старинные привилегии, запрещавшие возводить на евреев кровавый навет. С тех пор кровавые наветы в Польше возникали сравнительно редко.

Вскоре после присоединения к России в результате разделов Польши большей части территории, густо населенной евреями, начался первый из известных в Российской империи процессов по обвинению евреев в ритуальных убийствах, проходивший в 1799 г. в городе Сенно (около 50 км к юго-западу от Витебска). В основание дела легли не какие-либо конкретные улики, а лишь молва, что евреям нужна христианская кровь, и выступление выкреста в роли обвинителя. За недостаточностью улик арестованные по этому делу евреи были освобождены вопреки категорическому заявлению поэта и сенатора Г. Р. Державина, что все евреи повинны в «злобном пролитии по их талмудам христианской крови».

Гродненский кровавый навет (1816) побудил в 1817 г. министра духовных дел и народного просвещения А. Н. Голицына предписать губернским властям впредь не обвинять евреев в убийстве христианских детей без улик («по единому предрассудку»). Тем не менее, в 1823 г. было возбуждено Велижское дело, в 1827 г. проходил процесс в городе Тельшяй, а в 1830 г. возник кровавый навет в Изяславе. Утверждая прекращение Велижского дела, царь Николай I все же добавил, что он не убежден в невиновности евреев.

Результатом решения Министерства внутренних дел досконально исследовать вопрос об обоснованности обвинения евреев в ритуальных убийствах явилась записка под названием «Розыскание об убиении евреями христианских младенцев и употреблении крови их» (1844), составление которой приписывалось лексикографу В. И. Далю или директору департамента духовных дел иностранных исповеданий В. В. Скрипицыну. Автор записки приходит к заключению, что обвинение евреев в ритуальных убийствах вполне обоснованно.

В 1852 г. возник кровавый навет в Грузии. Процесс по обвинению евреев в ритуальном убийстве двух христианских мальчиков в Саратове, расследование которого началось в 1853 г., длился семь лет и был единственным в России кровавым наветом, который привел к осуждению обвиняемых. Хотя государственный совет, занявшийся пересмотром приговора, не обсуждал связанный с процессом ритуальный момент, в районе Саратова во время судебного разбирательства возникло примерно 15 дел похищения христианских детей, в которых обвиняли не только евреев, но и «хохлов», немцев-колонистов и других.

В связи с Саратовским делом при департаменте духовных дел иностранных исповеданий была в 1855 г. учреждена особая комиссия (в работе которой участвовали семитологи-выкресты Д. Хвольсон и В. А. Левисон) по рассмотрению отобранных у подсудимых книг и манускриптов «с целью разъяснения тайных догматов религиозного изуверства евреев». Ее отчет отвергал как возможность употребления христианской крови евреями, так и оскорбление ими христианской веры или надругательство над ее таинствами.

В Западной и Центральной Европе кровавые наветы практически прекратились после эпохи Реформации. Против них выступали даже злейшие враги евреев. Общественное мнение и научные круги отвергли как нелепые инсинуации утверждения известного ориенталиста-антисемита И. А. Эйзенменгера, который в полном различных выпадов против евреев двухтомном сочинении «Разоблаченное еврейство» (1700) отстаивал обоснованность обвинения их в ритуальных убийствах. Просвещенное европейское общество было убеждено, что в культурном мире нет больше места кровавым наветам. Однако в 1840 г. монахи-капуцины, которым покровительствовало правительство Франции, возбудили Дамасское дело.

Оно вызвало возмущение мирового еврейства и острую полемику в кругах западноевропейской общественности; многие неевреи выступили против кровавых наветов, но были и такие (как, например, некоторые левые гегельянцы), которые связывали приписываемые евреям изуверские обычаи со старинным культом Молоха в Ханаане. Другие утверждали, что тайные еврейские секты нуждаются в христианской крови для отправления своего ритуала.

Новая волна кровавых наветов связана с возникновением и развитием современной антисемитской идеологии в Европе (см. Антисемитизм). В связи с кровавым наветом в Кутаиси в 1879 г. распространился в России ряд публикаций, обвинявших евреев в ритуальных убийствах. Особой злобностью отличались сочинения бывшего ксендза И. И. Лютостанского. В Венгрии в 1883 г. проходил нашумевший процесс в Тисаэсларе; в Богемии — Гильзнера дело (1899). В тот же период были совершены попытки возбудить процессы по кровавым наветам в Германии. В Греции возводились кровавые наветы один за другим в 1870–90-х гг. Такие же наветы возникали и в греческой и армянской диаспорах в пределах Османской империи. Они оказали влияние на ее мусульманское население и привели к возникновению кровавых наветов также среди него.

В начале 20 в. в Европе вновь появляются ритуальные процессы или попытки возбудить их: дело Блондеса (1900; см. Вильнюс) и кровавый навет в Дубоссарах (1903). После роспуска 2-й Государственной думы (1907) и с усилением реакции царское правительство попыталось использовать кровавый навет для подавления демократических движений, в которых участвовали многие евреи, и инспирировало дело Бейлиса (1911–13; см. М. М. Бейлис). Провал процесса стал политическим поражением русского самодержавия, однако вплоть до революции 1917 г. власти по-прежнему способствовали распространению в народных массах слухов о ритуальных преступлениях евреев.

Антисемитская пропаганда нацистов в 1930-х гг. усиленно насаждала в массах веру в совершение евреями ритуальных убийств. Этому был целиком посвящен выпуск газеты «Штюрмер» от 1 мая 1934 г., а статья «Ритуальное убийство» в «Карманном словаре немецких суеверий» (т. 7, 1935) завершалась словами: «… с какой целью и для чего использовали евреи кровь?» Подобными инсинуациями инспирирован ряд судебных процессов по кровавым наветам не только в Германии (Бамберг, 1937), но и в подпавших под влияние нацистов (Клайпеда, Литва, 1936) и оккупированных ими (Вельгартице, протекторат Богемия и Моравия, 1940). Даже в послевоенной Восточной Европе имелись случаи кровавого навета (Кельце, Польша, 1946).

В декабре 1919 г. советские власти создали Комиссию для исследования материалов по ритуальным процессам (С. Дубнов, Г. Слиозберг, Л. Штернберг, Г. Красный-Адмони, 1881–1970, и четверо русских ученых с профессором С. Платоновым во главе). Подготовленный ею том документов Гродненского дела (1816) не вышел в свет. Хотя власти объявили войну религиозным предрассудкам и суевериям, провели процесс над осудившими Бейлиса и провозгласили антисемитизм преступлением, в среднеазиатских республиках и на Кавказе время от времени возникали кровавые наветы (1921 г. — Сачхери, Грузинская ССР; 1923 г. — Тбилиси, Грузинская ССР; 1926 г. — Чарджоу, Туркменская ССР; Ахалцихе, Грузинская ССР; 1929 г. — Дагестан; 1930 г. — Ахалик близ Самарканда, Узбекская ССР).

В 1960-х гг. исступленная антиизраильская пропаганда, принявшая явно антисемитский характер, создала почву не только для возобновления кровавых наветов, исходивших от населения (Маргелан, 1961, Ташкент, 1962 — Узбекская ССР; Цхалтубо, 1963, Зестафони, 1964, Кутаиси, 1965 — Грузинская ССР), но и для аналогичных выступлений в официальной советской прессе (см. Бухарские евреи, Горские евреи), прекратившихся, однако, под давлением мировой общественности.

В связи с пропагандой против Государства Израиль в 1950–60-х гг. в арабских странах поощрялись переводы немецкой и французской антисемитской литературы на арабский язык. В Египте вышли в свет книги, содержащие кровавый навет (например: «Тайны сионизма», 1957; «Человеческие жертвоприношения в Талмуде», 1962; «Ватикан и евреи», 1964). Такого рода сочинения появились также в Греции, Италии, Испании и в некоторых странах Латинской Америки.

Еще еврейские ученые средневековья (главным образом на публичных диспутах), а позднее Ва‘ад четырех земель и Литовский ва‘ад в 17–18 вв. боролись с кровавым наветом. Их нелепость доказывал Менашше бен Исраэль в адресованном английскому парламенту латинском сочинении «Vindiciae Judaeorum» («В защиту евреев», 1656). Ту же цель в 19 в. преследовали И. Б. Левинзон в «Эфес дамим» («Нет крови», 1837; в русском переводе «Дамоклов меч», 1883), апостаты Д. А. Хвольсон («О некоторых средневековых обвинениях против евреев», 1861) и П. С. Кассель («Символика крови», 1882), христианские гебраисты Г. Л. Штрак, Ф. Делич и многие другие.

Глубоко укоренившиеся суеверия и предрассудки, испокон веков связанные с магическими и целебными свойствами, приписываемыми крови, а также центральное место, которое жертвоприношение Иисуса и искупающая сила его крови занимает в христианской догматике, послужили стимулом к усилению враждебности к еврейству и евреям. Взрывы религиозного фанатизма, соперничество между церквами и монашескими орденами в прошлом, а также социальные противоречия и вспышки шовинизма в современном мире часто сопровождаются кровавыми наветами, инспирируемыми изуверами и демагогами, для достижения своих целей апеллирующими к самым низменным инстинктам масс.

Source: https://eleven.co.il/diaspora/judeophobia-anti-semitism/12241/

The New York Times has played a major line of distortion and misrepresentation. One that says,  “We are for science'” and you flyover country people hold on to and maintain for your ignorant non-scientific religion.

NYT Article:

Liberal Left Intellectuals, corporate legacy media culture, whose ideology dominate staff at news outlets such as the New York Times, whom many of us used to enjoy reading in the past, look down on Evangelicals who do not buy into their worldviews and who they see as getting Trump into office as president. For Leftist Progessives, such dissident viewpoints, positions and values are unacceptable thought crimes. That is why nonconformist views move them to pen articles of the kind you just read.

What do we know about blood libels?

Blood libel, also called blood accusation, the superstitious accusation that Jews ritually sacrifice Christian children at Passover to obtain blood for unleavened bread. It first emerged in medieval Europe in the 12th century and was revived sporadically in eastern and central Europe throughout the medieval and modern periods, often leading to the persecution of Jews.

Christian attitudes toward Jews during the Middle Ages were reflected in the economic, social, and political life of medieval societies. Until about the 11th century, manifestations of anti-Semitism were relatively infrequent. In fact, in the early medieval period there were frequent contacts between Christians and Jews, who intermarried and shared language and culture.

The situation became complicated after about the year 1000, as Christian society began a process of reorganization that contributed to the marginalization of Jews as well as of other groups. In 1096 knights of the First Crusade unleashed a wave of anti-Semitic violence in France and the Holy Roman Empire, including massacres in Worms, Trier (both now in Germany), and Metz (now in France). Unfounded accusations against Jews of such gruesome actions as ritual murder and host desecration began to spread. In 1144 an English boy, William of Norwich, was found brutally murdered with strange wounds to his head, arms, and torso. His uncle, a priest, blamed local Jews, and a rumour spread that Jews crucified a Christian child every year at Passover. A century later an investigation into the death of another boy, Hugh of Lincoln (died 1255), sparked anti-Jewish fervour that resulted in the execution of 19 English Jews. The story of “Little Saint Hugh” soon became part of popular literature and song, and he was widely venerated as a martyr.

The blood libel reemerged in Damascus in 1840 and in Tiszaeszlár, Hung., in 1882. In both cases, torture was used to obtain false confessions, though the accused were ultimately cleared. The most infamous occurrence of the blood libel in modern times was the case of Mendel Beilis, a Jewish factory manager in Kiev (now in Ukraine), who was accused of ritual murder by the tsarist government in 1911. Imprisoned for more than two years, he was eventually acquitted by an all-Christian jury. In the 1930s the blood libel became part of Nazi propaganda. It was subsequently a staple of anti-Semitic propaganda in parts of Europe and the Arab world.

The Anatomy of COVID-19

Christians and Medicine

In fact, Evangelical and other Christians have been forefront in medical advancements which have been to the benefit and life preservation of millions of people of all backgrounds:

Joseph Lister

M0006512 Joseph Lister, 1st Baron Lister [1827 – 1912] surgeon

 

Acknowledged as the “Father of Antiseptic Surgery”, Joseph Lister’s (1827-1912) contributions paved the way to safer medical procedures. His introduction of the antiseptic process dramatically decreased deaths from childbirth and surgery and changed the way the medical industry looked at sanitation and proper hygiene.

Early Life and Education

Joseph Lister was born on April 5, 1827 in Upton, Essex, England. His father, Joseph Jackson Lister, was not only a wine merchant, but was also an amateur scientist. He was the second among three children.

Coming from a family of Quakers, the young Joseph Lister also attended Quaker Schools in London and Hertfordshire. Quaker Schools put in a great amount of emphasis in the sciences, giving him a strong foundation in what was to be his chosen profession.

He observed the first surgical procedure that used anesthesia in 1846. He then attended the University of London where he earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1847. Later on, he qualified to become a medical student and earned his Bachelor’s degrees in Medicine and Surgery. Because of his exceptional performance, he was awarded with two university gold medals and easily became a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons the same year in 1852. He then became the dresser for Professor of Clinical Surgery James Syme in Edinburgh, and eventually became his house surgeon.

Joseph Lister has always been aware that the number of deaths after surgery was not caused by the operation itself, but by what follows after the procedure. Because there was an alarming rate of “ward fever” after surgery, Lister wondered what could be causing this event.

Comparing patients who had simple fractures to those who had compound fractures, he concluded that the infection was coming from the outside, as the problem only occurred to those who had open wounds as compared to those who did not have any flesh wound. Lister started adding hygienic practices before conducting any operation, making sure that his hands were clean and his clothes fresh. At that time, it was common for doctors to walk around covered in blood as this served as a status symbol for them. Lister’s untraditional methods were scoffed at.

Looking at research done by Louis Pasteur, a French chemist and microbiologist known for his vaccination, fermentation and pasteurization principles, he agreed with the latter’s belief that germs are usually contracted from the air. Because Lister was a wine merchant’s son, he knew that wine went bad because the fermentation process was not done properly, and not because germs spontaneously came to life within the wine as evolutionists believed. Applying this thought to open wounds, he knew that the only solution was to find a way to kill the germs before they get the chance to enter the wound, preventing the infection to occur.

Carbolic acid was then being used as an effective disinfectant for sewers. Upon confirming that it was safe to be used on human flesh, Joseph Lister saw it as the solution to the problem. He started using it to wash his hands, as well as the instruments he needed in every operation. He started covering his patients’ wounds with a piece of lint covered in carbolic acid. He also devised a machine that sprayed the air with carbolic acid to get rid of airborne germs. He refined his techniques until he had enough proof that everything he did was successful, and went on to publish everything he discovered in a medical journal “The Lancet” in 1867.

As expected, it took a long time for other people in the medical field to accept Lister’s findings. A lot of them were incredulous at the thought that organisms too small to be seen were causing all the post-operation deaths. Some found it tiring to have to go through the sterilization process before performing an operation. And although some of them tried Lister’s methods, majority of them did it incorrectly that their efforts proved to be useless. He was now a Professor of Clinical Surgery in Edinburgh, and he continued to modify his system to achieve better results despite the negative feedback.

It took 12 long years before Lister’s system gained widespread acceptance. Those who emulated Lister’s example in Munich gained astounding success, with the death rate caused by infection after surgery dropping from 80% to almost zero. The English doctors were among the last to accept the brilliance of Lister’s methods, only winning them over when he was appointed as Professor of Surgery in London’s King’s College Hospital in 1877. By 1879, his findings had gained widespread acceptance around the globe.

Other Achievements

Joseph Lister was the Queen’s surgeon for many years, and introduced the use of rubber drainage tubes after trying it on her. He also showed that sterilized materials could be left inside a patient’s body as needed and used and left sterilized silver wire inside the body to keep broken bones together. And since the silk thread used in internal stitching causes more damage when pulled out after some time, Lister started using sterilized catgut, as this would eventually dissolve.

Queen Victoria dubbed him Sir Joseph Lister in 1883. He became Lord Lister of Lyme Regis in 1897, and was the first to become a British peer for services to medicine. He was given the Order of Merit in 1902, and was made Privy Councilor.

He became the Vice President of the Royal College of Surgeons and President of the Royal Society. He was also President of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. He helped establish the British Institute of Preventative Medicine in 1891, which was later on called The Lister Institute in his honor.

Louis Pasteur

pasteur

Pasteur was a devout Catholic and was “regarded as conforming with the biblical account of the creation.”2 At the time, the concept of spontaneous generation was widely accepted, which maintained that life was generated by non-life (i.e., maggots appeared to arise out of exposed animal carcasses). Darwin used this theory, also known as abiogenesis, to propose that the first life forms miraculously grew out of a “warm little pond, with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, lights, heat, electricity, etc.”3

Pasteur conducted experiments comparing organic material that was exposed to air with organic material that was not. Nothing grew in the sealed or filtered vessels. This empirically demonstrated that the fermentation in the open containers was caused by the growth of microorganisms from the air, not spontaneous generation, thus proving biogenesis (life begets life). His studies led to the practices of sterilization and “pasteur”ization, particularly in the fields of medicine and food preparation. He wasn’t the first to propose the theory that germs cause disease, but his experiments supported it and he shares the title of “the father of germ theory and bacteriology” with German physician Robert Koch.

Pasteur received criticism for his work and detail-oriented methods. He wouldn’t make any claim until he had re-tested several times and was sure of the results. His vigorous approach to his work eventually led to perhaps his most significant contributions: the anthrax and rabies vaccines. Anthrax was responsible for destroying whole flocks of sheep in France, and Pasteur successfully demonstrated the survival of inoculated sheep from the vaccines he developed.

In 1880, Pasteur and his pupils began research into hydrophobia, or rabies. At the time, treatments included cauterization with hot irons, stifling sufferers between two mattresses, and other useless “remedies.” Pasteur isolated the rabies virus and developed both a non-virulent and a virulent vaccine. The non-virulent version was given to a nine-year-old boy bitten by a mad dog in 1885. The vaccine succeeded, as it did in subsequent cases. On October 26, 1885, Pasteur officially presented his research on hydrophobia, preventative vaccines, and vaccination treatment applied after infection, and this work was highly praised.

On June 4, 1887, the Pasteur Institute was established in Paris so Pasteur and his researchers could expand their work on infectious diseases.4 A university was also named for him, and he received high honors and acclaim from his peers, years after he had endured their criticism. Later in life, he suffered from a series of strokes and died from complications in 1895 near Paris.

Pasteur’s work set the foundation for some of the most important advances in our modern world. He was an experimentalist of the highest order, and his science was undoubtedly fueled by his faith:

Are science and the passionate desire to understand anything else than the effect of that spur towards knowledge which the mystery of the universe has placed in our souls? Where are the true sources of human dignity, of liberty, of modern democracy, unless they are contained in the idea of the infinite, before which all men are equal?5, 6

References

  1. Keim, A. and L. Lumet. Translated by Cooper, F. T. 1914. Louis Pasteur. New York, NY: Frederick A. Stokes Company, 5-6.
  2. Ibid, 63.
  3. Darwin, C. Written in 1871, published in 1887. The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter, vol. 3. London: John Murray, 18.
  4. The history of the Pasteur Institute. Posted online at www.pasteur.fr/english.html, accessed September 22, 2008.
  5. Keim and Lumet, Louis Pasteur, 143.
  6. Galatians 3:28.

Alexander Gordon

Alexander Gordon (1752-1799) was a renowned Edwardian obstetrician best known for being the first person to describe the infectious nature of childbirth fever in his paper of 1795 entitled Treatise on the Epidemic Puerperal Fever of Aberdeen.[1][2] His remarkable paper gave insights into the contagious nature of puerperal fever more than half a century before Ignaz Semmelweis and before the science of bacteria was known about.[3]

Gordon was born in 1752 in Strachan, Scotland. He studied medicine at the University of Aberdeen‘s Marischal College.[4]

Gordon was son of a farmer at Milton of Drum, a few miles west of Aberdeen. He studied at Marischal College, Aberdeen, between 1771-5 and then began medical studies at Aberdeen Infirmary. University medical teaching in Aberdeen at that time was poor, so he continued his studies in Edinburgh and Leyden. He did not graduate, but learned sufficiently for him to obtain a Certificate of Proficiency from the Company of Surgeons, which allowed him to join the Royal Navy as a surgeon’s mate in 1780. He was promoted to surgeon in 1781. In 1785 he retired from the navy on a half pay pension and spent nine months in London getting instruction and gaining experience in midwifery. He may already have planned to return to Aberdeen as he would have known that there was no doctor in the city with obstetric experience. He moved back to Aberdeen in 1785 and was appointed physician to the Aberdeen Dispensary in 1786. He was awarded MD from Aberdeen in 1788.1[5]

Selected Leading Jewish Figures in Germ Theory

Robert Koch

The German physician Robert Koch (1843-1910) contributed so much to the field of microbiology and infectious diseases. A contemporary of Louis Pasteur, Koch worked as a physician most of his life.

Some of the great contributions to the field of microbiology and infectious diseases include identifying the bacterium that causes anthrax (Bacillus anthracis) in 1877. He recognized both the actively dividing cells and the dormant cells (spores) and developed techniques for studying them outside the body.

Another great contribution, which microbiologists today can be thankful for, is developing a way to grow bacteria in pure culture. After trying different media (potato slices, gelatin, etc) he used a cooking thickener (agar) which created a firm surface so the bacteria could be spread very thinly over the surface.

The micro organism is spread so thinly that individual organisms are separated from each other. Then after time, each individual organism would multiply to form a visible colony from its millions of descendants.

Koch’s discovery of the method of preparing pure culture of bacteria allowed German microbiologists to advance well ahead of microbiologists of France and other nations who were still using broth culture and successive dilutions to get a single organism.

Other work attributed to Koch includes the discoveries of Vibrio cholera in 1883 and the tuberculosis bacterium in 1882 and his studies in tuberculosis later resulted in his winning the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1905.

He is also recognized for his work in Africa with Trypanosoma and tick borne spirochetes.

But what many think his greatest contribution in microbiology and infectious diseases is his formulation of four postulates that associate a particular organism with a specific disease.

Koch’s postulates are as following:

1. The specific causative agent must be found in every case of the disease.
2. The disease organism must be isolated in pure culture.
3. Inoculation of a sample of the culture into a healthy, susceptible animal must produce the same disease.
4. The disease organism must be recovered from the inoculated animal.

Implied in Koch’s postulates are the one organism-one disease concept and it provided the method of establishing the germ theory of disease.

Robert Koch had many other accomplishments in the field of microbiology and infectious diseases and was well respected on the continents of Africa and Asia for his work.

Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis

Semmelweis was born into a family of wealthy grocers. The fifth of ten children, as a young man he initially studied law before switching to medicine. Awarded his medical degree at the age of 26, he went on to work as an assistant to Professor Johann Klein in the First Obstetrical Clinic at the Vienna General Hospital. At that time, the clinic had an average maternal mortality rate for puerperal fever of around 10 percent. To the physicians of the time, it seemed that nothing could be done to reduce this death toll.

The Vienna General hospital had two maternity clinics. Interestingly, with a mortality rate for puerperal fever of only 4 percent, the Second Clinic had a far lower number of deaths than the First Clinic. Not surprisingly, therefore, because of the poor reputation of the First Clinic, women begged to be admitted into the Second Clinic. In desperation, some even preferred to give birth in the streets. Statistics showed that these women, too, only rarely developed puerperal fever. But nobody knew why. So Semmelweis began to investigate.

Ignaz Semmelweis was the first doctor to discover the importance for medical professionals of hand washing. In the 19th century, it was common for women to die from an illness contracted during or after childbirth, known as childbed fever. While working at an obstetric department in Vienna, Austria, Semmelweis noticed that women delivered by physicians and medical students had a much higher mortality rate than women delivered by midwives. He concluded that the problem was that physicians were handling corpses during autopsies before attending to pregnant women, and determined that hand washing would prevent them from passing on illness.

After Semmelweis initiated a mandatory hand-washing policy, the mortality rate for women delivered by doctors fell from 18 per cent to 2 per cent – the same as it was for midwives. When he began washing medical instruments, it fell to just 1 per cent.

Nevertheless, the senior staff at the hospital still did not accept that doctors were causing the women’s disease. They believed that infections were spread through the air by something called miasmas, and attributed the low death rate to a new ventilation system. Semmelweis got another job as head of obstetrics in Budapest, Hungary, where he again succeeded at reducing mortality by insisting that doctors wash their hands.

In 1861, he published a book on his findings about how to prevent childbed fever, but it was poorly received. He died in a public insane asylum five years later, at the age of 47.

Semmelweis must take some of the blame for his failure to win over his colleagues. Accounts describe him as arrogant and angry, with a tendency to insult and humiliate his opponents.

His work was only widely appreciated two decades later, after research by Louis Pasteur, Robert Koch and Joseph Lister produced more evidence for germ theory and antiseptic techniques.

Historians are quick to remind that Semmelweis was not the first physician to make this clinical connection, one that many expectant mothers of the era called “the doctors’ plague.” For example, the obstetrician Alexander Gordon of Aberdeen, Scotland, suggested in his 1795 Treatise on the Epidemic of Puerperal Fever that midwives and doctors who had recently treated women for puerperal fever spread the malady to other women. More famously, in 1843 Oliver Wendell Holmes, the Harvard anatomist and self-proclaimed “autocrat of the breakfast table,” published “The Contagiousness of Puerperal Fever,” in which he discerned that the disease was spread by physicians and recommended that actively practicing obstetricians abstain from performing autopsies on women who died of puerperal fever as one of their “paramount obligations to society.”

That said, it was Dr. Semmelweis who ordered his medical students and junior physicians to wash their hands in a chlorinated lime solution until the smell of the putrid bodies they dissected in the autopsy suite was no longer detectable. Soon after instituting this protocol in 1847, the mortality rates on the doctor-dominated obstetrics service plummeted.

Unfortunately, Semmelweis’s ideas were not accepted by all of his colleagues. Indeed, many were outraged at the suggestion that they were the cause of their patients’ miserable deaths. Consequently, Semmelweis met with enormous resistance and criticism.

All of the above figures have a Judeo-Christian background. They were raised with a knowledge of the Bible and or of biblical knowledge and values. This background was drawn from and used in their medical practical in ways that is often not written about or told.

The Corona – Milgram Experiment

Narrative: leading people in what is talked about. The programming of reality through a narrative. Let us read on.

The coronavirus is NOT the poison. It is but a new delivery vehicle to shift populations through fear so a place where they surrender their rights of their own free will. The result of the virus will not be virus illness alone. This is only a primary element. The virus is serving in the role to set off a chain reaction of particular social behaviors.

Corona is serving to get people to climb into a bird cage by their own free will. Yet don’t be that bird.

Coronavirus is a RESET. It is about social re-conditioning. You are being re-mothered.

sb

Prepared Words: You have noticed how everyone started talking “self-isolation” all at the same time. Like it was waiting on the shelf to use at a time when the shelves are being emptied.

Manufactured Panic

This is Manufactured Panic. Bringing people to the end of their rope economically. People tried to “burn down their own neighbourhoods and areas (L.A. Riots 1992)”

Those riots lasted only six days, yet left 55 dead and more than 2,000 injured. The days of chaos left lasting scars.

Think the police will be enough during a riot? ‘Think again.’

(L.A. Burning: The Riots 25 Years Later – Gun Store Manager David Joo Looks Back)

The People of Wuhan Speak and Share This Inside Truth

Locals have a different story to tell you on what happened and what is going on where they live.

Present Time (March 2020 and Onward … ):

Social control masquerading as sensitivity. People snitching. All more unhealthy morally than any virus.

It’s not the virus. It is the waves that will come from this psychology of the virus.

The Coronavirus phenomenon is an economic war. It will effect supply chains. That means certain areas will be out of food. Meaning further you will more likely run out of food than get the virus.

The coronavirus is a means to take us into Earth Summit (Rio Summit 1992) protocols. The Earth or Rio Summit was about imposing S J Res 69. Better known as ‘Agenda 21’ and  whose name was changed to Agenda 2030. To understand what this piecemeal functionalism is all about you can watch the Iron Mountain Report (Video):

People all over the world have willingly accepted what is nothing less than varying degrees of martial law (we use the cute off the company shelf euphemism ‘ self-isolation’). We have accepted closure of churches and synagogues. Yet liquor stores and abortion clinics are kept open. In short, a Babylonian Technocracy tells us to move out of the way so we can keep doing their stuff. Watch for removal of cash and imposition of various digital currencies as means of exchange. Merely a completion of a piecemeal functionalism program (step by step implementation of desired regime change goals).

China praised for its draconian lock down measures as template for ‘sound’ action.

The economy is being shifted/destroyed in order to introduce a RESET. On the other side many small and medium sized businesses will be bankrupted. In their place titan corporations offering online services under oligopoly new circumstances and arrangements. This is not hard to forecast.

The ‘Online’ Bandwagon

Another result of the Coronavirus is a megashift moving people onto Online Platforms. These platforms allow being to keep working and going to school while minimizing social contact. Yet another side of this is a very strong gravitational centralization of power into the hands of a very few who govern the Zeitgeist narrative of this day. The major business, government, tech titans will have unprecedented access as a result of these changes to your children’s minds right from the home. In the 1930s it was the radio which permitted a failed Viennese artist to accomplish the same. In fact, there is talk by politicians and others of fining people who challenge this present coronavirus narrative.  In Britain the police are using drones to chase down quarantine violators.

Is this less than the Nazi’s abuse of their population’s minds and lives? You decide.

Western Countries are driving themselves into darkness out of their own personal fears. A sociopathic technocratic elite (yes you Bill) will gladly use such slowballing fears.

What Happens when a Society Becomes Afraid to Say the Truth? (The Rotherham Coverup)

This censoring and demanding populations submit to a narrative will work like the Grammarly software. It will place a RED LINE under you if you adhere to dissident views. Already in Great Britain police hold though crimes more serious than actual physical violence. Such as the Rotherham child rapes they covered up for decades.  These child rapes did not happen as one offs in one city. They happened in dozens of communities across the United Kingdom over decades! Can’t happen in your neighbourhood? Let us see. Fear of being called ‘racist’ kept hundreds of police, politicians, council workers, nurses, doctors and other health officials from speaking out and telling the truth of these rapes of hundreds of young British girls. Mostly white girls; and Punjabi girls. Raped by Pakistani Muslim men – acting in organized packs, covered by cowardly politicians.

(The Ongoing Issue)

(Evidence 1)

Social Distancing is an Obedience Experiment

One notices how the narrative is shifting to shelter in place. The social distancing demand is not about virus contamination alone. It is a social behaviour experiment to see if populations obey orders.

Police in United Kingdom using drones (the new normal) to monitor and enforce population self-isolation.

Soon: major bankruptcies of small and medium businesses. Large corporations repositioning themselves for serious online sales and market expansion. Extra staff hired during virus will be laid off. More drone use by corporations.

This is depicted in the movie ‘Experimenter (below):

The Milgram experiment(s) on obedience to authority figures was a series of social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram. They measured the willingness of study participants, men from a diverse range of occupations with varying levels of education, to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to believe that they were assisting an unrelated experiment, in which they had to administer electric shocks to a “learner.” These fake electric shocks gradually increased to levels that would have been fatal had they been real.

The experiment found, unexpectedly, that a very high proportion of subjects would fully obey the instructions, albeit reluctantly. Milgram first described his research in a 1963 article in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology[1] and later discussed his findings in greater depth in his 1974 book, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View.

With the Coronavirus, the experiment is also about conscience and decision making. In the Corona Experiment we shall see how far you and other people are willing to go in  locking yourselves and other people down. To submit to things one would usually defrain from submitting to.

Unsure of What Lockdowns Can Become?   

Night of the Pencils

The Destroyer and the Global Passover

(Is this Lockdown – jail? ; or an unexpected Shabbat we are experiencing together around the world?)

The_Angel_of_Death

EKIDS1G45 Ten Plagues 18

3-5_passover-boy

The Fire in the Wilderness at the Sea of Reeds (Red Sea) was death for the Egyptians yet life and protection and covering for the Hebrews being brought out of that imperial world system and its mental confinements. Mizraim (Hebrew: ‘confinement’)

In the first possible ‘globally observed’ Pesach (Passover). One where the world is at home, either under duress or for their own well being. You decide. Maybe the two are the simultaneous truth?

Having to stay indoors? Under ‘shelter in place’ or ‘social distancing’? For those of you who observe Pesach you can also observe that you have been told to stay indoors while the Destroyer ‘passes over’ . Egypt you see is representative of the ‘larger world society.’ In Ancient Mizraim (Egypt).

You are experiencing a Martial Law for some and an unexpected Shabbat for others. It all depends on the state of ones heart. Much in the way that the Ten Plagues and the Exodus from Egypt was death for some and life for others.

In Egypt of Old, the people of Egypt, even the Pharaoh who ruled over what was then the strongest empire in the world, and the Hebrews (Jacob, Israel, the Jewish People), had to go through an experience together.

A set of experiences really. The land and economy of Egypt was to be destroyed.

The Ten Plagues

exodus-hailstorm

egypt-destroyed-by-meteors-chesley-bonestell

Do you have blood on the doorposts of your home and more importantly upon the doorposts of your heart?

The Financial Players/Elites (i.e. above Prime Minister and Presidential levels) are watching people in the society beneath them willingly hand over their rights (i.e. People in Wuhan welded into their apartment buildings; Spain, California is martial law; other countries under partial quarantine; people simply agreed to the change because of their own fears)

‘Fast Boat from China’

The ‘Wuhan Virus‘ or ‘Coronavirus‘ was quickly renamed ‘COVD-19‘ Why COVD-19 ? To make the subject of discussion sound ‘more legitimate’ and ‘scientific sounding’ so you don’t challenge the narrative being pushed; and to keep you guessing on what the whole matter might be about. Much in the same way your legacy corporate media (low viewership, bankrolled talking heads and narratives) threw around the terms “ISIL, Daesh, ISIS” morphing them, changing letters, etc… without providing explanation or clarity for you their listeners.  The corporate media act as ‘repeater stations’ or re-broadcasters for new terminology to spread, like a virus. Second, to shift it from a localised China – originated matter into a global scare.

The coronavirus is the bite.  NOT the venom.

The New Green Deal and Greenwashing

With the dropping of air pollution levels in cities around the world one can understand calls for a Green Pact will only be pushed the more. My word on this is that all of us benefit from cleaner air. This is not argued. Yet this ‘Green New Deal’ is about a massive transfer of land and wealth under proposed Agenda 21/2030 laws.

Spraypaint it Green

After Mikhail Gorbachev found himself unemployed with the end of the Soviet Union (see Shatalin 500 Day Plan) and all the societal collapse that ensued he was just as soon given a new job. Remember it? Remember the old Presidio Base in San Fran? Gorbachev was made the Head of a new organization called the International Green Cross. Environmental. Legit sounding language for an international body. No relation to all these shifts of course. Freebee: Gorbachev also converted to Catholicism. What the …? Very odd. Out of place. ‘Get it now?’ Extra Freebee: Former Prime Minister Tony Blair of United Kingdom fame, and weapons of mass destruction infamy, also converted to Catholicism. This happened right at the time he got a brand new job as the Special Middle East Envoy.  No relation of course.

If we have to ‘greenwash’ it to sell it to you, so be it. A New Green Religion with Priesthood and Purveyors and Pied Pipers (yes Greta) to make it all seem right to you. Why confess to a priest when you can confess to a secular priest (yet you have had psychologists for years now right?)

Want to tax the churches? No problem. The one that really runs the show has already arranged a new revenue out of your pocket. You ascended to it remember? ‘Yet it is for the trees I’m sure.’  Tithing is good for the cash register. Why should carbon taxes bring in any less?

Salesmanship and Sleuth

Carbon Credits are merely modern Sales of Indulgences (sold to common people by the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages) as guarantee that this would get their dead relatives out of purgatory a million years earlier. Buy Carbon Credits, save the earth from destruction. Same game, different words.

Dirty Money

The Coronavirus is being used as a catalyst to phase out use of cash and instead go full digital. https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/filthy-lucre-paper-money-shunned-for-fear-of-virus-spread-1.4861006

Note: when you pay in cash banks see when you spend your money on. If they deem you your spending is not to their likely you could later be denied a loan as it is all being recorded. Cash spending has granted independence. That is being removed; and not accidentally either. Governments prefer full digital of course as it allows they to see if persons, businesses and institutions are paying all their taxes. No surprise there.

The ongoing coronavirus psychology has created an environment where people are being monitored by drones (i.e. France) to see if they are keeping quarantine. Very interestingly, these same authorities not long ago were calling for open borders. The logic of governments we are witnessing first hand does not fit. Governments prefer docile, servile, populations and they operate with different sets of rules for different groups thus betraying the people who elected them and the constitutions of their own countries. Yet Globalists understand no not respect citizenry any more than landlords in the middle ages paid respect to their peasants in the fields. The aim of globalist politicians is to fulfill the orders of their real masters, not you, and lock down their peasants whose ancestors won rights (English Right of Petition, Habeas Corpus, American Bill of Rights, Declaration of the Rights of Man, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, etc… These aristocrats, who smile at you when on camera, see constitutions as things of nuisance that never should have been issued to the flyover country people, deplorables, the unwashed (that’s you).

Citizens in various jurisdictions at this present time are mostly complying and handing over their rights. Why so willing to hand over their rights? Simple. Personal fears; educated in an education system that doesn’t educate; daily news propaganda; low value on their rights to begin with; never sacrificed in their own lives therefore cannot understand the sacrifices of the World War Two generation and others. These coronavirus scare policies note are being pushed by the same financial players/kingmakers who have long been calling for open borders. They lock down national populations, yet while aiming to bring in new ones (plantation workers; voting machines, etc…).  Regimes prefer populations which are beholden to them. They don’t like question askers.

Black Death Compared

There has been comparison of the Wuhan-Coronavirus and the Spanish Flu (1918). We can speak on that more after.

Yet let us if you will go back further to think some thoughts.

Comparison to ‘Black Death’ or ‘Black Plague’ (Eurasian Bubonic Plague Pandemic  1347-1352). This plague entered Europe from Asia by way of Venetian and Genovese caravels coming in from Kaffa and the Black Sea area. Mongols troops surrounding Genovese Kaffa(Sudak) were catapulting plague ridden bodies over the walls into their Genovese fortress on the Black Sea coast. Ships from here brought rats and fleas and people into Southern Europe. It all began to spread like wildfire from there.

What can we learn from the aftermath of the Black Plague? So many people died that they would tear the roofs off buildings and pile the bodies inside. There was also a huge labor shortage as a result (one – third to one – half of Europe had died) After the plague abated wages for the average worker went up. Such as for farmers; just to bring the crops in. Many of the nobility died. Thus new nobility rose in their place. Also, lands were freed up. The prices on land fell. People who managed to survive could buy land for cheaper than they could before the plague. There was a whole re-positioning of society. Those who were re-positioned and ready to make a move could acquire new properties they had not held before.

‘The Magicians Hands Show’

The coronavirus did not just ‘show up’ as on natural reasons.  It is by all intelligent observation and local monitoring and outward proliferation a lab spliced mutation doctored at a well known biomedical facility in Wuhan, China. All medical people in that province knew of this center. You are being shown a game, a film, a documentary like they showed during World War II to audiences in cinemas. To form you. To steer you. Same thing.

95 – percent of antibiotic and high level and regular medical pharmaceuticals used by the United States are manufactured in China. Convenient right. Not an accident that there is major supply chain deficit in the United States. The US Government will likely being offering ‘drive – through innocculations’ because the medical product exports from China are withheld as punishment; or only released at high retaliation level tariffs (or as rationing).

Jade Helm and other national military positioning is already underway. Certain, more regular military personal are being quarantines on base. Yet others are on the move. Who is who?

Watch for blocked highways. Watch for new movement and people tagging laws (i.e. various biometrics, finger readers to go in and out of public buildings, to use public services, supermarkets, liquor stores,  ID2020, etc…) to come into effect.

National parliaments are being sent home on prolonged holiday breaks. They are self-quarantined. This is preplanned, invested for use language. Think the government is going on autopilot? No. Only the unnecessaries are being sent home so they won’t be in assembly to cross examine governmental changes coming.

With you under lock-down (quarantine) at home, and not flying as usual, important changes can be rolled out without you the civilian in the way, nosing around.

On the big scale, what you are experiencing right now is called ‘Piecemeal Functionalism‘ . Piecemeal Functionalism is where new economic and political changes are introduced phase by phase in order to bring about new regime.

Note: Watch for talk of ‘new forms of the virus or new mutations’ wherein you will be asked to volunteer away even more of your rights. Interesting how people who have been out on the streets for years clamouring that they don’t have enough rights have surrendered their rights so fast.  You see, they were not really talking about “rights”. They merely wanted to be left alone to worship their idols of preference.

RBTM Updates

National Idols Kicked Over

Many of your ‘adored’ national idols are going to get kicked over as globalists attempt to reassert and expand their hegemony wherever possible in a planetary way. They employ many presidents and prime ministers who are, by their own actions show each day, not public servants of their own countries and peoples of those countries. This is why these figures are always making statements on “our international agreements.” They don’t work for you. Take hold of that truth if you can. Most of these servants were all to glad to join up in high school. Yes scholarships, such as Rhodes Scholarships, Rotary Club Scholarships are MK Ultra, Tavastock, CFR clubbery. Yet as a member of these clubs you get to wine and dine – for a while. Those who went to college on those scholarships are beholden to their sponsors of course.

The Capitalism/Socialism Argument is a Psychological ‘Red Herring’

Hyper predatory capitalism is not the answer. This is cold and uncaring towards people. For those guys sell their own grandmothers.

On the other side, understand, that: Socialism is the candy, Communism is the tooth decay. Socialism is also responsible for the deaths of 100 million people during the Twentieth Century.  Socialist States don’t ask you – they TELL you.

Each side, whether on the right or on the left, is a Hegelian play on the mind. Both are incomplete wanting halves of the full whole. Instead, the healthy place you want to be is what I term:

Disorientation Re-Management

What I will term ‘disorientation remanagement’.

Listen to people’s words in order to that their hearts contents be revealed. Yet the fruit that falls from their trees reveals the most.

I have been thinking about changes going on right now for those of you in the United States, Russia, China and around the world. For you where you are too. A restructuring is underway around the world.  This is known as ‘Piecemeal Functionalism’ or ‘Gleichschaltung.’ Yet only the ‘sunny details’ see any sunlight.

Gleichschaltung

Multiculturalism was promoted in order to dilute nation states. So that the citizens would then have nothing to rally around. Then there is the disappearance of diversity.Norbert Borrmann (the author) recognizes the danger of advancing monotony and the lack of originality in urban planning and construction. But the sphere of architecture is only symbolic for larger, world-encompassing processes of unification. That is why Borrmann, in the 37th volume of the kaplaken series, makes clear what is actually meant by the most important pillars of globalization and “one world” in the external as well as “multicultural” in the interior:

1. Globalization means Americanization. The alleged enrichment by foreign and distant cultures turns out to be a farce in favor of a standardization of art, music, culture and language.

2. The dream of the world-state becomes a nightmare, because the leveling of the differences of whole peoples and cultures in the course of the globalization thus irrevocably linked.

3. The same applies to the “multicultural society” concept. “Bunt” leads to “gray”, which, of course, disrupts the advocates of this ideology, as is the fact that the supposed anti-capitalists, with the creation of an “industrial reserve army” (Karl Marx), primarily use capitalism.

According to Borrmann, what is nowadays called diversity is nothing to do with it. Instead of actual plurality, the “disappearance of the multiplicity of the world” (Alain de Benoist) concealed behind these phrases in the sign of universalist ideology.

First, there are some questions we need to ask together:

Many of you have been asking yourselves why Communist ideas are spreading among America’s youth and on the colleges?  Whether ‘Leftist’ or ‘Rightist’ political ideology is of no importance. Whichever side of the pendulum can be used to seize people and govern over them for a purpose – will be used.

“Rightspeak”

You have noticed like I have how certain new (old game) terminology is being thrown out there which serves nothing less than to bait people to fight (1984 language). The young on America’s, and other western, college campuses are being governed by Pavlov (triggered) models and then steered accordingly.

Race‘ has been flowed forth into the public square to set people at each others necks almost as if it came up from a backfilled toilet to pour out all over the floor. Street fighting (Antifa, White Nationalists, etc…) on the horizontal level. This is not unlike having a bone with some meat flung into an alley for stray dogs to attack. The difference of course being that Antifa is backed by many city politicians. White Nationalists cannot come into an open forum for long without being booed away. Neither group should impress anyone. Further there are the environmental activists. They are the flock of a new green religion. They are like paid low level mercenaries. Yet human beings who have been pied pipered way to a flute or young girl. Led by a drum. Rushing forth at the sign of a red cape. Before the Orange Revolution and EuroMaidan (Soros Color Revolutions) I was personal witness to lines of unemployed youth and students, ages 17-25, who were paid (50 Hryvna/day at the time) to go out and protest everywhere they were sent.   This busyness conveniently keeps common people from asking unwanted questions to their governing aristocracy. The Western Mainstream Legacy (endless funds even when nobody is watching) Media use Russia as an ever shadowy boogie man so while you watch for ‘Boris and Natasha’ you won’t ask too many of the right questions from those upstairs on the home front. All the while China and Saudi Arabia buy up key interests in the United States. Globalists have a far less free hand in the Russian Federation. Yet platform themselves out of places like China. That is why one region gets critique, while the other doesn’t.

Mental Steering

Understand, the ‘white supremacist’ label which has been injected into public conversation, and rebroadcast over and over by your legacy MSM (bankrolled and controlled media) is only aimed to touch your regular, tax paying person. Instead of saying “white supremacist” more accurately this is “elitist” or “aristocratic”. Such as in days of old. They never went away. The Loyalty of such people is not to skin color it is only to mammon.

In short the goal being to strip away the constitutional rights of an awakened, armed middle class in the American context (the people in the other Western countries have been disarmed already; or are in the process of being disarmed). These are not criminals. Yet they are being slandered as such because they are a wall impeding the hegemony of tyrannical government. Just people who want to live free. The elite live above the law and above the taxes through foundations (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Clinton Foundation, Foundation Families you see on screen at opening of PBS programming, etc…) being examples. What you are observing is Hegelian division being used to divide so that a new regime can be introduced. You are facing determinists who believe that the end justifies the means. ‘They have no scruples.’

The New Age Eye

Understand the people at the top driving this are often white. Yet they are a kind of people who could care less about their skin colour. Their god is mammon. The worship themselves and see others as demi-humans who are in the way of the Age of Aquarius changes which must be brought in. They are born white. Yet this is irrelevant. For they are New Agers introducing a new global religion (just add GREEN food coloring) for humanity (the humanity that is to be kept that is)

Note: The smart person doesn’t swim with but instead sideways from the river flow of the corporate media’s clockwork script.

“Essential Workers Only”

Churches and synagogues closed. Yet liquor stores and abortion clinics still open. Normal to you? People quarantined at home (or elsewhere) unless deemed “essential workers” and businesses.

This is a test from God unto you and I to see what institutions we value in our society. ‘Plain and simple.’

Back in the USSR

In the Soviet Union, the government did not want people to focus on their own ethnic or racial background. You see they were building what was called “the New Soviet Man’. Free from the backwardness and discriminatory beliefs people were held by in the past.

The thing is, in order to usher in this new order of theirs, they murdered 20-40 million of their own people along the way. Gain for but a small few of party higher ups. A very un- peaceful economy for the rest.

The same is going on with this green climate religion eugenics mentality in the West. It is not different. Instead of a red flag this time the colour is ‘green.’ If you won’t join in on the climate change bandwagon groupthink then you are a racist or a hater.

Yet inside the real Russia the story of who Russians are is quite something different that what the Mainstream Media (Western garb Pravda) has spun.

MC asks for you “How did Communism come to Russia?” and what should Americans and others know about that long experience?

When I was living in the Former Soviet Union over a generation ago I was told about a banking coup. I began researching something called the Shatalin 500 Day Plan ( a piecemeal deconstruction’ economic plan to take apart the Soviet Union though what was then termed market transition. For Russians, who were being thrown off their feet, and watching their life savings in rubles devalued away, while they were jumping out windows, these changes were sold to Russians as Perestrioka (Rus: ‘restructuring’). Note: this model for mass privatization (theft of family jewels) was introduced into the United Kingdom in the 1980s;  and in South Africa, New Zealand and Alberta, Canada in the 1990s. These steps gave globalist shareholders access to former state and crown corporations and resources and the closed markets they had existed in.  I will explain more about this as we go deeper into this series. Same program, different names.

The Logos Middle

Yet where humans, who are more and more becoming insensitive robots, attempt to control other humans and populations God who is God draws us near:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/98/Logos.svg/220px-Logos.svg.png

‘Logos’ is where Life and Truth are found. The is the realm of Living Waters.

The normal dictionary denotation of

Logos (UK: /ˈlɡɒs, ˈlɒɡɒs/, US: /ˈlɡs/; Ancient Greek: λόγος, romanizedlógos; from λέγω, légō, lit. ’I say’) is a term in Western philosophy, psychology, rhetoric, and religion derived from a Greek word variously meaning “ground”, “plea”, “opinion”, “expectation”, “word”, “speech”, “account”, “reason”, “proportion”, and “discourse”.[1][2] It became a technical term in Western philosophy beginning with Heraclitus (c.  535 – c.  475 BC), who used the term for a principle of order and knowledge.

Hebrew

‘Logos’ comes from Davar (Hebrew: דבר‎, lit. Word)

The Road of Deliverance

The Greek word ‘logos’ comes from the Hebrew ‘davar’ . This word is related to two other Hebrew words ‘Mimra’ and also ‘Moshiach (Where we get our English word ‘Messiah’)

‘Don’t be a part of the chaos. Be a part of the calm.’

Friends …

*If you have read this far then my website has not been shutdown thus far. Consider yourself a participant in a not small miracle.

*Follow us here at RBTM for more strong insights and pressing news to help you navigate in your days ahead.

(Above: Some pics from Siberia for my readers)